Francisco Nunez-Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202220-70343California1,759 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO NUNEZ-GONZALEZ, No. 20-70343

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-967-430

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and HELLERSTEIN, *** District Judge.

Francisco Nunez-Gonzalez (“Petitioner”), a thirty-three-year-old native and

citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.