Carlos Sandoval-Garay v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 202217-70022California967 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 13 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS EDUARDO SANDOVAL- No. 17-70022

GARAY,

Agency No. A206-762-466 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and KANE,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. Petitioner Carlos Eduardo Sandoval-Garay (“Sandoval”), a native and

citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.