Ernesto Martinez v. David Shinn

Good Law
33 F.4th 1254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202221-99006California5,416 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO SALGADO MARTINEZ, No. 21-99006 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cv-01561-

ROS

DAVID SHINN, Director; JAMES KIMBLE,* Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex, OPINION Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding*

Submitted May 27, 2021** San Francisco, California

Filed May 16, 2022

* James Kimble has been substituted for his predecessor, Charles Goldsmith, as Warden of the Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

SUMMARY***

Habeas Corpus / Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

The panel denied Ernesto Salado Martinez’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA) that would allow Martinez to challenge the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.