People v. Santana CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2022C093432ACalifornia5,138 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/16/22 P. v. Santana CA3 Opinion following rehearing

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C093432

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 00F06961)

v. OPINION ON REHEARING

ALEJANDRO SANTANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Alejandro Santana guilty of the robbery-carjacking murder of a car salesman while on a test drive in 2000. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. (People v. Santana (June 10, 2010, C060202) [nonpub. opn.] (Santana).) Defendant appealed from the summary denial of his postjudgment petition to vacate his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.