In re Isaiah B. CA2/7

background check.

3 At the 12-month review hearing (§ 366.21, subd. (f)) on May 14, 2019, the Department reported E.T. was in substantial compliance with her case plan, but questioned whether she had learned anything from her programs. The Department stated that E.T. was quick to anger during wraparound sessions in her home and unable to adjust, either on her own or when assisted by a wraparound services parent partner. The Department also informed the court E.T. had been somewhat inconsistent in visiting with Isaiah. The Department recommended reunification services be terminated. The court found E.T.’s compliance with her case plan substantial and, over the Department’s objection, ordered Isaiah (and Matthew) returned to E.T.’s custody with family maintenance services. The court ordered E.T. to drug and alcohol test “on demand with reasonable suspicion,” to attend group anger management, to complete her one-year parenting course as ordered by the criminal court when it sentenced her in the child endangerment case, and to make Isaiah available for unannounced visits by the Department. The court ordered E.T. “not to allow” her children to have any contact with Frederick until…