Robert Barrozo v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202221-55916California724 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT BARROZO, No. 21-55916

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-07678-GW-PD v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, by and MEMORANDUM* through The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George B. Daniels, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Robert Barrozo appeals the denial of his request for the district court to take

judicial notice of an expert report issued in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.