Reynaldo Condori-Quiroz v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202219-70301California765 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REYNALDO JAIR ANDRE CONDORI- No. 19-70301

QUIROZ,

Agency No. A209-421-644 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, W. FLETCHER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Reynaldo Jair Andre Condori-Quiroz (Condori-Quiroz) petitions for review

of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) concurrence with a Department of Homeland

Security (DHS) asylum officer’s negative reasonable fear determination, and of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). DHS’s decision to execute Condori-Quiroz’s reinstated removal order. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.