Renaldo Navarro v. Menzies Aviation, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202221-15355California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RENALDO NAVARRO, No. 21-15355

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-08157-VC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MENZIES AVIATION, INC., DBA

Menzies,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS,*** District Judge.

In this diversity action, Renaldo Navarro alleges that his former employer,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Menzies Aviation, Inc. (Menzies), violated the California Fair Employment

Housing Act (FEHA) and California public policy by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.