Pedro Hernandez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202220-71178California827 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO SOLEDAD HERNANDEZ, No. 20-71178

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-786-336

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2022** San Francisco, California *** Before: O’SCANNLAIN and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BAKER, International Trade Judge.

Pedro Soledad Hernandez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision denying his applications for withholding of removal and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.