James Austin v. Robert Brown
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 16 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES AUSTIN, AKA James Russell No. 20-56028 Austin, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:18-cv-00600-WQH-JLB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROBERT BROWN, Community Resource Manager; FABRICE HADJADJ, Rabbi Chaplain; J. DAVIES, AA/PIO; P. COVELLO, Chief Deputy Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 13, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California prisoner James Austin appeals pro se from the district court’s
grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants1 in his action alleging that his
religious exercise was impermissibly burdened by periodic cancellations of