Christine Alire v. the Gap, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202221-55752California694 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINE ALIRE, No. 21-55752

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-01203-JWH-DFM and

SHADI HAYDEN; JERRY HO; WILLIAM MEMORANDUM*

HANNUM; OLGA MARYAMCHIK;

CAROL JULIAN-MOYE; JACQUELINE

SMITH; VICTORIA CARUSO-DAVIS;

MICHAEL MURPHY; CAROL LLOYD;

SUSANA GUEVARA; SEAN

FREDERICK; ERIC GILBERT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE GAP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC.;

SEPHORA USA, INC.; ADVANCE AUTO

PARTS; BED, BATH & BEYOND INC.;

BEST BUY CO., INC.; BUY BUY BABY,

INC.; CALERES, INC.; CVS HEALTH

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. CORPORATION; DICK'S SPORTING

GOODS, INC.; L BRANDS, INC.; STEIN

MART, INC.; HOME DEPOT, INC.; THE

TJX COMPANIES, INC.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.