Christine Alire v. the Gap, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202221-55752California694 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTINE ALIRE, No. 21-55752
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-01203-JWH-DFM and
SHADI HAYDEN; JERRY HO; WILLIAM MEMORANDUM*
HANNUM; OLGA MARYAMCHIK;
CAROL JULIAN-MOYE; JACQUELINE
SMITH; VICTORIA CARUSO-DAVIS;
MICHAEL MURPHY; CAROL LLOYD;
SUSANA GUEVARA; SEAN
FREDERICK; ERIC GILBERT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE GAP, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC.;
SEPHORA USA, INC.; ADVANCE AUTO
PARTS; BED, BATH & BEYOND INC.;
BEST BUY CO., INC.; BUY BUY BABY,
INC.; CALERES, INC.; CVS HEALTH
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. CORPORATION; DICK'S SPORTING
GOODS, INC.; L BRANDS, INC.; STEIN
MART, INC.; HOME DEPOT, INC.; THE
TJX COMPANIES, INC.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge,…