Bin Zhang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202216-71930California968 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIN ZHANG, No. 16-71930

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-992-910

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 9, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SILVER, *** District Judge.

Bin Zhang petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal.1 We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). Reviewing the BIA’s adverse credibility

determination for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.