Antonio Borjas-Tranquilino v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 202219-70628California576 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 16 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO BORJAS-TRANQUILINO, No. 19-70628 AKA Antonio Borja, Agency No. A206-406-333 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 12, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS,*** District Judge.

Antonio Borjas-Tranquilino seeks review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George B. Daniels, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.