In re Ja.M. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2022A163596California6,810 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 5/17/22 In re Ja.M. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re Ja.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL A163596

SERVICES AGENCY,

(Alameda County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. JD-033294-01) v.

CASEY M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Casey M. (Father) appeals from jurisdiction and disposition orders in a dependency matter concerning his child, Ja.M. Father argues that the evidence does not support the juvenile court’s jurisdiction order, and that the court failed to state specific facts supporting its removal order as required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 361, subdivision (e).1 We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.