William Flores-Rivas v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202216-71018California571 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM ERNESTO FLORES-RIVAS, No. 16-71018 AKA William Ernesto Chacon-Rivas, AKA Jose Alfredo Flores, AKA Luis Alberto Agency No. A205-710-744 Flores, AKA Jose Alfredo Flores-Chacon, AKA William Rivas, AKA William Ernesto Rivas, MEMORANDUM*

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and AMON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

William Ernesto Flores-Rivas, a native and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.