United States v. Eduardo Padilla

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202221-50070California848 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50070

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-02805-AJB-1 v.

EDUARDO PADILLA, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and AMON,*** District Judge.

Eduardo Padilla challenges his convictions for importing methamphetamine

under 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and for conspiracy to launder money under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Page 2 of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.