Rosalio Banda v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 202217-71855California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSALIO CASAS BANDA, No. 17-71855

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-789-232

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Rosalio Casas Banda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of the

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal.

We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.