Stephen Fon v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
34 F.4th 810
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202220-73166California10,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 7, 2021 * San Francisco, California

Filed May 18, 2022

Before: Susan P. Graber and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer Choe-Groves, ** Judge.

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Opinion by Judge Graber; Concurrence by Judge Graber; Concurrence by Judge Collins; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Choe-Groves

SUMMARY ***

Immigration

Granting in part and denying in part Stephen Tamufor Fon’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, and remanding, the panel held that: (1) the record compelled a finding of past…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.