My Nguyen v. Michael Pallares

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202221-15359California670 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MY LOAN NGUYEN, No. 21-15359

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02952-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL PALLARES,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, W. FLETCHER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

My Loan Nguyen appeals from the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. §

2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Nguyen argues that incriminating

statements she made during custodial interrogation were admitted at her trial in

violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and that she received

ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard set

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.