My Nguyen v. Michael Pallares
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202221-15359California670 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MY LOAN NGUYEN, No. 21-15359
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02952-WHA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MICHAEL PALLARES,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, W. FLETCHER, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
My Loan Nguyen appeals from the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. §
2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Nguyen argues that incriminating
statements she made during custodial interrogation were admitted at her trial in
violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and that she received
ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard set
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). We…