Maria Rutenburg v. Twitter, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA RUTENBURG, No. 21-16074

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00548-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TWITTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JACK DORSEY,

Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. Rutenberg appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims without leave

to amend. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291 and we affirm. We review

de novo…