Juan Gomez-Rangel v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202217-70926California871 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 18 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN PABLO GOMEZ-RANGEL, AKA No. 17-70926 Juan Pedro Gomez, Agency No. A201-242-649 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and KANE,*** District Judge.

Juan Pablo Gomez-Rangel (“Gomez-Rangel”), a native and citizen of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Yvette Kane, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an order of the Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.