Christopher Ndiagu v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202219-72504California1,700 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 18 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER NDIAGU, No. 19-72504
Petitioner, Agency No. A093-456-688
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: BERZON, TALLMAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
Christopher Ndiagu (“Petitioner”), a native of Nigeria, petitions for review
of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition in part, deny it in part,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. and remand for proceedings consistent with this disposition.