Bifang Liu v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202216-71369California438 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 18 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BIFANG LIU, No. 16-71369
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-183-106
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 16, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: KLEINFELD, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bifang Liu (“Liu”) argues in her petition for review that the BIA erred in
upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility determination.1 We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.
We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial
evidence—under this standard, an agency’s finding is conclusive unless any
reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.…