Bifang Liu v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 202216-71369California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 18 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIFANG LIU, No. 16-71369

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-183-106

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, MILLER, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bifang Liu (“Liu”) argues in her petition for review that the BIA erred in

upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility determination.1 We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial

evidence—under this standard, an agency’s finding is conclusive unless any

reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.