Aurora Olea-Serefina v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
34 F.4th 856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202220-72231California5,291 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AURORA OLEA-SEREFINA, AKA No. 20-72231 Zerefina Aurora Olea Daza, Aurora Seferina Olea, Aurora Olea-Zerefina, Agency No. Petitioner, A074-306-081

v.

OPINION

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2021 * San Francisco, California

Filed May 19, 2022

Before: Susan P. Graber and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge **

Opinion by Judge Collins

* The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). ** The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. OLEA-SEREFINA V. GARLAND

SUMMARY ***

Immigration

Denying in part and dismissing in part Zerefina Aurora Olea Daza’s petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, the panel held that Olea’s conviction for corporal injury upon a child, in violation of California Penal Code § 273d(a), is a crime of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.