Sweetflower Pasadena v. City of Pasadena CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2022B312412California3,666 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/19/22 Sweetflower Pasadena v. City of Pasadena CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

SWEETFLOWER PASADENA B312412

LLC,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP03212) v.

CITY OF PASADENA,

Defendant,

INTEGRAL ASSOCIATES

DENA, LLC,

Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judge. Affirmed. Carlson & Nicholas, Richard A. McDonald for Real Party in Interest and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant. Nossaman, Artin N. Shaverdian, Gabriela S. Pérez, Gregory W. Sanders and John J. Flynn III for Plaintiff and Respondent. __________________ SweetFlower Pasadena, LLC filed a verified petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.