Sweetflower Pasadena v. City of Pasadena CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2022B308645California4,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/19/22 Sweetflower Pasadena v. City of Pasadena CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

SWEETFLOWER PASADENA, B308645

LLC,

(Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 20STCP01048) v.

CITY OF PASADENA,

Defendant,

HARVEST OF PASADENA,

LLC,

Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mitchell L. Beckloff, Judge. Affirmed. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Douglas Smurr, Charles V. Berwanger and Reid E. Dammann for Real Party in Interest and Appellant. No appearance for Defendant. Nossaman, Artin N. Shaverdian, Gabriela S. Pérez, Gregory W. Sanders and John J. Flynn III for Plaintiff and Respondent. ______________________ SweetFlower…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.