Rogerio Mendivil-Gutierrez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202219-72781California748 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGERIO MENDIVIL-GUTIERREZ, No. 19-72781

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-180-775

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Rogerio Mendivil-Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his

applications for cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We deny in part and dismiss

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). in part the petition for review.

1. Adverse credibility finding. In his opening brief before this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.