Mahan Taleshpour v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202221-16282California1,186 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAHAN TALESHPOUR, et al., No. 21-16282

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-03122-EJD

v. MEMORANDUM*

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,** Interna- tional Trade Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their putative class ac-

tion asserting statutory and common law claims against Apple under the laws of

California and other states based on an alleged defect that, sometime after the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. warranty expires,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.