Mahan Taleshpour v. Apple, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202221-16282California1,186 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAHAN TALESHPOUR, et al., No. 21-16282
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-03122-EJD
v. MEMORANDUM*
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 10, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,** Interna- tional Trade Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their putative class ac-
tion asserting statutory and common law claims against Apple under the laws of
California and other states based on an alleged defect that, sometime after the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. warranty expires,…