Lori Wallender v. Harney County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202221-35238California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORI WALLENDER; DANIEL No. 21-35238

WALLENDER,

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00004-SU Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

HARNEY COUNTY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAYES,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Lori and Daniel Wallender sued Harney County Assistant District Attorney

Ryan Hughes under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Hughes violated their Fourth

Amendment1 rights by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.