Andres Jovel-Romero v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202215-73760California1,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES REMBERTO JOVEL-ROMERO; No. 15-73760

TATIANA ELIZABETH JOVEL-

HERNANDEZ, Agency Nos. A202-074-430

A202-074-431

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Petitioners Andres Remberto Jovel-Romero (Andres) and his daughter,

Tatiana Elizabeth Jovel-Hernandez (Tatiana), appeal the Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.