L.A. Police Protective League v. City of L.A.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2022B306321California7,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

Segal, J.

INTRODUCTION

California requires law enforcement agencies to investigate complaints against peace officers. (See Pen. Code, § 832.5, subd. (a)(1).)1 Section 148.6, subdivision (a)(1), makes it a crime to file a knowingly false allegation of misconduct against a peace officer. And section 148.6, subdivision (a)(2), requires law enforcement agencies, before accepting a complaint alleging misconduct by a peace officer, to require the complainant to sign an advisory informing the complainant that filing a knowingly false complaint may result in criminal prosecution. In 2002 the California Supreme Court upheld section 148.6 against a challenge the statute was an impermissible content- based speech restriction under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. (People v. Stanistreet (2002) 29 Cal.4th 497, cert. den. 538 U.S. 120 [123 S.Ct. 1944, 155 L.Ed.2d 861] (Stanistreet)). Three years later, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reached a different conclusion. The Ninth Circuit ruled section 148.6 was an impermissible viewpoint-based speech restriction under the First Amendment because the statute criminalized false statements that accused a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.