People v. Dulin CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2022H048768California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background The prosecution charged Dulin with three counts: count 1—grand theft by an employee of property with a value exceeding $950 (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (b)(3))1; count 2—embezzlement by a private employee of property with a value exceeding $950 (§ 504); and count 3—forgery of checks with a value exceeding $950 (§ 470, subd. (d)). The prosecution alleged Dulin took property with a value exceeding $200,000 (§ 12022.6, subd. (a)(2)), and a value exceeding $1.3 million (§ 12022.6, subd. (a)(3)). The prosecution further alleged the offenses involved a pattern of related felony conduct with the taking of more than $500,000. (§ 186.11, subds. (a)(1) & (a)(2).) As part of a negotiated plea agreement, Dulin pleaded no contest to all counts as charged and admitted the allegations. The trial court imposed a total term of five years eight months in prison. The court further imposed a victim restitution fine of $1,984,771.63. Dulin filed a timely notice of appeal and did not request a certificate of probable cause. B. Facts of the Offenses According to the facts set forth in the probation report, Dulin was an employee at Lord & Sons,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.