Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Nektar Therapeutics
34 F.4th 828
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 202221-15170California5,228 words
Opinion
Opinion
Lee 2 IN RE NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS SECURITIES LITIG., J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS No. 21-15170
SECURITIES LITIGATION,
D.C. No. 4:18-cv-06607-
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION HSG
AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM; EL PASO
FIREMEN & POLICEMENS PENSION
FUND, Lead Plaintiffs, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS; HOWARD
W. ROBIN; STEPHEN K. DOBERSTEIN;
JONATHAN ZALEVSKY,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 10, 2021 Pasadena, California
Filed May 19, 2022
Before: Milan D. Smith, Jr., Kenneth K. Lee, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Lee IN RE NEKTAR THERAPEUTICS SECURITIES LITIG.
SUMMARY *
Securities Fraud
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a Second Amended Complaint in which two public pensions sued Nektar Therapeutics for securities fraud, alleging that Nektar misleadingly relied on outlier data from a single patient during the Phase 1 clinical trial of its anti-cancer drug, NKTR-214.