Purushottam Poudel v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202215-71756California341 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PURUSHOTTAM POUDEL, No. 15-71756

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-446-763

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Purushottam Poudel, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

proceedings.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960,

964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

We previously denied Poudel’s petition for review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.