Michael Woolsey v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202220-16885California1,136 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL WOOLSEY, No. 20-16885
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00578-SMB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 7, 2022 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Michael Woolsey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
attorneys’ fees under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 following a remand on his claim for benefits to Aetna. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review an award of fees for abuse of discretion, but “any
elements of legal analysis and statutory interpretation which figure in the district
court’s decision are…