Marcus Briceno v. Blake Williams
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202221-55624California3,270 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARCUS D. BRICENO, No. 21-55624
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-01665-JAH-AGS v.
BLAKE WILLIAMS, San Diego Police MEMORANDUM* Officer,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
CHRIS CUMMINGS, San Diego Police Officer,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: BERZON, TALLMAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.
In this § 1983 excessive force case, Blake Williams, an officer with the San
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Diego Police Department, appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment
based on qualified immunity.
Our jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of summary
judgment based on qualified immunity is limited. See Mitchell v. Forsyth,…