Gabriel Minasyan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202215-70862California363 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL MINASYAN; HASMIK No. 15-70862

MINASSIAN; HAKOB MINASYAN,

Agency Nos. A075-648-887 Petitioners, A075-648-888

A075-648-890

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Gabriel, Hasmik, and Hakob Minasyan, natives and citizens of Armenia,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order of

February 19, 2015, denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.