Amichai Ohring v. Unisea, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 202221-35591California843 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMICHAI OHRING, individually and on No. 21-35591 behalf of other similarly situated individuals, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00359-TSZ Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNISEA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 13, 2022 Seattle, Washington

Before: BOGGS,** HAWKINS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge HAWKINS.

Defendant UniSea, Inc. appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion

to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16, and we review

denial of a motion to compel arbitration de novo. Wilson v. Huuuge, Inc., 944 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.