People v. Velazquez-Cordero CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2022A156420California5,322 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/22 P. v. Velazquez-Cordero CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A156420

v. DANIEL VELAZQUEZ-CORDERO, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 17NF012699) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Daniel Velazquez-Cordero guilty of multiple counts of robbery and false imprisonment for his role in the armed robbery of a bank in Daly City. The evidence admitted at trial included cell phone records showing defendant’s location in Daly City at the time of the robbery. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting this location data evidence because it had been previously suppressed twice, and under Penal Code1 section 1538.5, subdivisions (j) and (p), the People could not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.