Studio 1220, Inc. v. Intralinks, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202221-16066California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STUDIO 1220, INC., a California No. 21-16066 corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-02892-VC

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

and

INFORMATECH CONSULTING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTRALINKS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION;

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted May 19, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

Studio 1220, Inc. appeals the district court’s order under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissing its fraudulent concealment claim against Intralinks,

Inc. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.