Guillermo Guzman-Gomez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202220-72349California695 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

GUILLERMO GUZMAN-GOMEZ, No. 20-72349

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-313-763

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 19, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: MILLER and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Guillermo Guzman-Gomez, a native of Mexico, petitions for review of the

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of the

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for cancellation of removal. We

have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.