Willie Smith v. Aaron Ford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202221-16042California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIE T. SMITH, No. 21-16042

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00501-JAD-CLB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AARON FORD; JAMES DZURENDA; C.

DANIELS; B. WILLIAMS; J. NASH; W.

GITTERE; D. DRUMMOND; W.

REUBART; S. MOYLE; T. SANDOVAL; J.

BARTH; D. SOUTHWORTH; W. MOORE;

MARY SHAKAYLA, St.; THRASHER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Willie T. Smith appeals pro se from the district court’s

order denying his motion for injunctive relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging various constitutional claims. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.