Raymond Pierson, III v. Sutter Health

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202221-15220California708 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND HAMEL PIERSON III, pro se, No. 21-15220

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00124-TLN-KJN

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SUTTER HEALTH; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Hamel Pierson III appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment in his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of the

temporary suspension of his hospital admitting privileges. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pierson’s request for oral argument, set forth in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.