Raymond Pierson, III v. Sutter Health
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAYMOND HAMEL PIERSON III, pro se, No. 21-15220
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00124-TLN-KJN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SUTTER HEALTH; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Raymond Hamel Pierson III appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment in his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of the
temporary suspension of his hospital admitting privileges. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pierson’s request for oral argument, set forth in…