Karlene Petitt v. Air Line Pilots Association

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202221-35494California304 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARLENE K. PETITT, No. 21-35494

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01093-RSL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, AKA

ALPA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Karlene K. Petitt appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in her

action alleging breach of the duty of fair representation in connection with an

arbitration hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Puri v. Khalsa,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.