Josue Arana-Arana v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202219-72817California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSUE EMANUEL ARANA-ARANA; et No. 19-72817 al., Agency Nos. A208-192-264 Petitioners, A208-308-973

A208-308-974

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 9, 2022** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Josue Emanuel Arana-Arana, Reina Izabel Aguilar Ruano, and Yensy Izabel

Arana Aguilar (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for

asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.