Jack Johnson v. J. Milson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202220-56250California298 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JACK ORLANDO JOHNSON, No. 20-56250
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07485-VBF-PD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. MILSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 17, 2022**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Jack Orlando Johnson appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical
needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (en…