Irvin Ramirez-Gomez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 202221-70669California855 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRVIN SAMUEL RAMIREZ-GOMEZ, No. 21-70669

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-129-112

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 18, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Irvin Samuel Ramirez-Gomez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing

his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition in part

and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.