Silva

Silva v. Langford CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2022B312660California5,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 5/24/22 Silva v. Langford CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

MARAKKALAGE THARAL D. B312660

SILVA et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 20STCV04867) v.

RICHARD SCOTT LANGFORD

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Huey P. Cotton, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions. Law Offices of Ali Taheripour and Ali Taheripour; Law Offices of Les T. Zador and Leslie T. Zador for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, and Danielle F. O’Bannon, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents Richard Scott Langford and State of California, acting by and through the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.