People v. Martin CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2022F083334California684 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Appellant and defendant Christopher T. Martin was found in violation of his Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS), ordered to serve local time, and reinstated on PRCS. On appeal, his appellate counsel has filed a brief that summarizes the facts with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Conviction and Sentence On September 18, 2020, appellant was convicted of violating Penal Code section 273a, subdivision (a), willful child endangerment, in the Superior Court of Kings County case No. 21CS0047; he was sentenced to four years state prison. On March 15, 2021, appellant was released from state prison and placed on PRCS. The terms and conditions of his PRCS status included “comply[ing] with all the instruction[s] of your supervising county agency representative,” and to not have any contact with the victim. Petition to Revoke PRCS On July 22, 2021, the probation department filed a petition seeking to revoke appellant’s status on PRCS in case No. 21CS0047. The petition alleged that on July 21, 2021, appellant was contacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.