United States v. Linda Expose

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 202221-10234California262 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10234

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00044-DAD-BAM-1 v.

LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Linda Rose Expose appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for aggravated

identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Expose’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.